almediah.fr
» » Edward I (ENGLISH MONARCHS)

Download Edward I (ENGLISH MONARCHS) eBook

by Michael Prestwich

Download Edward I (ENGLISH MONARCHS) eBook
ISBN:
0520062663
Author:
Michael Prestwich
Category:
Leaders & Notable People
Language:
English
Publisher:
Univ of California Pr; 1st edition (August 1, 1988)
Pages:
633 pages
EPUB book:
1375 kb
FB2 book:
1751 kb
DJVU:
1748 kb
Other formats
docx lrf lrf azw
Rating:
4.5
Votes:
808


Michael Preswich's Edward I is a great book with only one flaw

Michael Preswich's Edward I is a great book with only one flaw. One the biggest questions, to me, about King Edward I is: exactly why is he called Edward 'the First' when there was not one, not two, but three Kings Edward before him. In addition to having multiple predecessors with his name, Edward Longshanks was also named after the previous King Edward, Edward the Confessor.

Edward I-one of the outstanding monarchs of the English Middle Ages-pioneered legal and parliamentary change in England, conquered Wales, and came close to conquering Scotland. A major player in European diplomacy and war, he acted as peacemaker during the 1280s but became involved in a bitter war with Philip IV a decade later.

Michael Charles Prestwich OBE (born 30 January 1943) is an English historian, specialising on the history of medieval England, in particular the reign of Edward I. He is retired. He is retired, having been Professor of History at Durham University, and Head of the Department of History until 2007. Prestwich is the son of two Oxford historians, John Prestwich (historian) and Menna Prestwich. His father,"the redoubtable mediaevalist.

The Yale English Monarchs series is a series of biographies on English and British kings and queens, published by Yale University Press

The Yale English Monarchs series is a series of biographies on English and British kings and queens, published by Yale University Press. Several books in the English Monarchs series have previously also been published by the University of California Press, though the series is today in the hands of Yale University Press.

A king who pioneered legal and parliamentary change, conquered Wales and came close to conquering Scotland, Edward I presents many contradictions. A pious man who built his reputation during the greatest chivalric adventure of the time, the Crusade, he quarrelled with his archbishops.

Also in the Yale English Monarchs Series ATHELSTAN by Sarah Foot EDWARD THE CONFESSOR by Frank Barlow WILLIAM THE . KING JOHN by W. L. Warren. EDWARD I by Michael Prestwich.

Also in the Yale English Monarchs Series ATHELSTAN by Sarah Foot EDWARD THE CONFESSOR by Frank Barlow WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR by David Douglas WILLIAM RUFUS by Frank Barlow HENRY . EDWARD II by Seymour Phillips. RICHARD II by Nigel Saul. Widely praised when it was first published in 1988, it is now reissued with a new introduction and updated bibliographic guide.

Edward I. Michael Prestwich. Yale University Press, 1997 - 618 sayfa

Edward I. Yale University Press, 1997 - 618 sayfa. Edward I-one of the outstanding monarchs of the English Middle Ages-pioneered legal and parliamentary change in England, conquered Wales, and came close to conquering Scotland.

Электронная книга "Edward I", Michael Prestwich Edward I-one of the outstanding monarchs of the English Middle Ages-pioneered legal and parliamentary change in England, conquered Wales, an. .

Электронная книга "Edward I", Michael Prestwich. Эту книгу можно прочитать в Google Play Книгах на компьютере, а также на устройствах Android и iOS. Выделяйте текст, добавляйте закладки и делайте заметки, скачав книгу "Edward I" для чтения в офлайн-режиме.

Traces the life of King Edward I, describes the accomplishments of his reign, and attempts to depict his complex personality
  • BroWelm
Michael Preswich's Edward I is a great book with only one flaw. One the biggest questions, to me, about King Edward I is: exactly why is he called Edward 'the First' when there was not one, not two, but three Kings Edward before him. In addition to having multiple predecessors with his name, Edward Longshanks was also named after the previous King Edward, Edward the Confessor. Yet nowhere in this book does this subject even come up! When I first read this book back in college, I asked my professor, Phil Cole of the University of Southern Maine, if he knew why the Hammer of the Scots was labeled number one, and he confessed he had no idea. I assume that Edward is listed as the first of his name because of Norman Conquest; although I have never found any official statement to that fact. Apparently in England they only count the kings and queens that occurred after the Norman Conquest.

During his time as a prince, young Edward, had some sympathies with the reform movement amongst the barons of England, but he would ultimately side with his father King Henry III against the reformers led by Simon De Montfort. When England broke into civil war it looked for a while that the reformers might actually win. Edward himself was captured but he and his father would ultimately prevail and Montfort would be dead.

After helping to secure his father's throne Prince Edward left England and went on crusade. His crusade, like many of them, was a very overrated experience and although Edward was proud to have gone. The Prince was grateful for the prestige his crusade gave him and always wanted to go again, but his adventure in the East did not led any significant accomplishment. What I found most fascinating was the way children were regarded in the middle ages. Since college I have known that people in the past, emotionally, kept their young children at arm's length. This was due to the child mortality rate at the time. Nevertheless I was stuck by Edward when he found out he lost his first-born son he seemed not to care, but when he was told he had become King because his father had died he cried nonstop. When questioned by this behavior he declares that he can always have more sons but he only had one father. Some logic in that I guess but it is very cold.

As King, Edward is known for three things: the `model' parliament, the conquest of Wales and the near conquest of Scotland. All three of these things are very well covered by Prestwich. Prestwich is always fair giving Edward credit where he thinks the old king deserved it but at the same time making it clear that he was not quite the `English Justinian' that he was always made out to be.

In parliament, he did pass a great deal of important legislation such as the two Westminster Acts. However what he is most known for is the composition of parliament, making sure it was represented by all interests of the kingdom. However, Prestwich points out that the composition of parliament was something done for the King's convenience not anyone else's.

"Although there were no clear rules defining who was entitled to receive summons to parliament, it is obvious that the king was looking for men whose advice he valued, and whose local power and authority he could not ignore. There was something of a concentration of men who held estates on the borders near Wales and Scotland, a natural reflection of their military importance. If a man was sufficiently distinguished, he might be summoned even though he was not a tenant-in-chief, or particularly wealthy." (p.447)

Even though Prestwich dispels a lot of myths about this medieval king, he does not try to deny his importance to the British Constitution. It was Edward's actions that allowed the Parliament to form into what it did and history shows other actions could have sent it to a different direction.

"Although parliament had played a very significant part in the political struggles of the late 1250s and 1260s, it would have been possible in the 1270s and 1280s for it to become something much more like the French parlement. That body was a specialized legal tribunal, with its own expert, learned staff, attended only rarely by the king himself. It was far superior to the English parliament in terms of records that were kept, and the professionalism of its staff, but its importance was much less, for it could never stand for the community of the realm, as the English parliament could. Had Edward not chosen to summon large numbers of magnates to his parliaments, along with representatives on occasion; had he not chosen to receive petitions, often in considerable quantity, in parliaments; then there might have appeared in England a small, specialized parliament, little more than a legal committee of the royal council, along the French lines." (p.460)

King Edward's other far lasting contribution was the conquest of Wales. Kings of England since the days of William the Conqueror had been receiving homage from Welsh princes, although they never sought to rule Wales directly. Prestwich argues that the wars were largely provoked by the Prince of Wales himself, Llywelyn ap Gruffydd, for refusing Edward homage and openly aiding his enemies such as the allies of Simon de Montfort.

"Although it is possible to criticize much that Edward did in Wales, the fact remains that he was in the end thoroughly successful. Of course his resources were immeasurably greater than those of the Welsh, but the Welsh had succeeded in retaining a considerable degree of independence in the face of powerful English kings ever since the Norman Conquest. Edward had now taken a major step towards the eventual political unification of the British Isles, though in his later years he was to find that he could not repeat in Scotland what he had achieved in Wales." (p. 232)

Edward is probably most famous for his almost conquest of Scotland. This fame has increased since the 1990s because of Mel Gibson's Braveheart, which I acknowledge as the source of my interest in King Edward I. In that movie, Patrick McGoohan portrays King Edward and he does bring the character to life. However, it needs to be pointed out that the movie is not very historically accurate.

The war was primarily caused by Edward's bulling. Asked to oversee a succession dispute, King Edward picks the right candidate in John Balliol, but then proceeds to completely humiliate him to the point the new King cannot control his own country. Edward deposes the Scottish King John who turns out to be, unfortunately, more a loser than King Edward's grandfather the English King John*. Although it had seemed to Edward that he had conquered Scotland, he would find he would have to keep reconquering it to the point it would bankrupt his treasury, Edward would win only a Pyrrhic victory over William Wallace and Robert the Bruce. Robert would go into to become King of Scotland while Wallace would suffer a terrible death.

"From Edward's point of view, there can have been no doubt whatsoever that Wallace was a traitor who deserved to die a traitor's death. The king may appear today to have been ungenerous in failing to recognize the obvious qualities of his victim, who had shown a great capacity for leadership. Yet Wallace had not conducted his campaigns according to the chivalric code of the day, and there is no reason why Edward should have treated him with compassion or respect." (p.503)

In the end this a great book about a fascinating individual. He was a giant among men both literally** and figuratively. Historians had been fascinated by him ever since, even to the point of opening his coffin in 1774. Michael Prestwich does a very good job separating the man and the legend.

*It is interesting to point out that neither England nor Scotland ever had another king named John.

**He was well over six feet in an age where that was rare.
  • Original
This books is so rich in historical fact and details, drawn from medieval records of that period. For someone wanting more than the superficial, this book supplies it, showing Edward in a scholarly fashion rather than the usual pro or con look. It's very details in what it cost to run Longshanks' kingship, right down the wars against Wales and Scotland.
Very balanced in presentation and offers us a deep insight into the man who remade England, conquered the Welsh and Irish, fought France and faced the rise of William Wallace and Robert the Bruce.
Highly recommended.
  • Sironynyr
One thing I like about the Yale English Monarchs Series is they convey a wealth of information about the various rulers of England, starting from William the Conqueror and covering most of the kings and queens to modern times. Most of the books I have read about the lives of English monarchs never reference primary sources as to why historians believe what they do about a monarch; the Monarchs Series books do that and more, though you have to be an "egg-head" to really get in to the book or the writing will put you to sleep.
  • allegro
Books as long as this one are not popular today--and what a shame, because this rich history is one of the finest I have read. The book is so fully researched that the reader may feel free to skip about, focusing on chapters closest to his interests, without guilt. Like many thousands (perhaps even millions) of other Americans, I am a direct descendant of this extraordinary king; and this book illuminates his life and times every bit as fully as I had hoped. One learns, not only about the personalities of his court, but about the intricate details of daily life, the ways in which war was waged and castles built, the political cross-currents--in short, it is a remarkably informative history of the times. Enjoy!
  • Fearlessdweller
interesting read
  • shustrik
Undoubtedly well researched and competently presented, I was left with the wish that the author had leavened his work with an occasional touch of humor. Only my deep interest in English history kept me going to the end, especially through long descriptions of the activities of the king's household that could have cured insomnia. Considering the inglorious end to the reign of his son, Edward II, an epilog chapter to Edward I's biography would have been welcome, or at least more attention paid to the relationship between the latter and his heir.
  • Gigafish
I expected this book to be well researched and it certainly is , but the fact that it is so well written kind of surprised me. This was a joy to read.
Very good.